November 27, 2017, 1pm PST | Irvin Dawid in Planetizen
The legislature placed a $4.1 billion water bond on the ballot in June while a privately funded initiative hopes to qualify an $8.9 billion water bond for the November ballot. The state measure would also fund parks and trails.
"California has a long history of using bonds to finance major water projects," reports Kurtis Alexander for the San Francisco Chronicle on Nov. 24. "More than a dozen have been approved since the 1970s."
In fact, Alexander notes that there is $2.7 billion remaining from a $7 billion, 2014 bond measure, Proposition 1, which agribusiness hopes will be used for new reservoirs. Neither of the two bond measures next year would fund new dams.
"The Legislature’s $4.1 billion [general obligation] bond measure on the June ballotwas forged as a compromise among several interest groups," writes Alexander. The measure was authorized in October after Gov. Jerry Brown signed SB 5: "California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018," authored by Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles).
Its water-related components lean away from traditional infrastructure projects such as new dams, and toward funding for recycling, construction of flood-control levees and cleanup of polluted waterways.
Close to half the bond money, however, would have little or nothing to do with water projects. Some would go to park acquisition and maintenance, much of it in Southern California. Money would be allocated for trail construction and land conservation in the Bay Area. Low-income communities would be given priority for the funding.
Meral supports the Legislature’s bond but says it wouldn’t go far enough. He is leading a signature drive to qualify an $8.9 billion bond for the November ballot, and appears to have the financial support, largely from farmers, to get it there.
Like the Legislature’s measure, Meral’s proposed bond would support recycling, groundwater and clean-up programs. But it would also pay for traditional water projects such as improved canals for farm irrigation in the Central Valley....[and] include $200 million for Oroville Dam repairs and millions more for other reservoir upgrades.
No opposition is sited for the state measure, unlike the private initiative. "Some worry about the high price, while the Sierra Club calls it a 'pay-for-play' deal that will serve big growers and other wealthy water users," writes Alexander. However, it does have support of urban water suppliers and wildlife group.
Backgrouind information on the private initiative can be found in this August Planning Report interview of Jerry Meral and Brian Jordan, vice president of civil engineering firm Tetra Tech. Meral refers to the potential measure as the "Joe Caves’ initiative" who is with the Conservation Strategy Group.
Published on Sunday, November 26, 2017 in San Francisco Chronicle